Recent Comments

No comments to show.
Recent Comments

    current Research Looks At The difference In Morals Between Theists Atheists

    curent Research Loks At The diference In Morals Betwen Theists Atheists
    Religion serves diferent purposes for diferent people, including, in some cases, helping to guide their fable compas. A modern lok published in PLOS ONE set out to setle how these personal values might difer betwen atheists and theists. Here’s what researchers found while diging into this enchanting question.
    Studying the values of theists atheists.
    In an efort to understand how alegory values difer betwen those who acquire in a god or gods and those who don’t, asistant profesor of psychology at the University of Ilinois at Chicago Tomas Stahl, Ph.D., sent out online surveys that questioned the values of over 4,50 Americans and Swedes acros four separate studies.
    The first two stud ies eager 429 American atheists and theists, and the second batch fervent 4,193 atheists and theists from America and Sweden. Stahl notes in his research that being religious in the U.S. is more comon than it is in Sweden, one of the most secular countries in the world.
    The similarities–and key diferences–betwen the two groups.
    The theists and atheists sampled in these surveys did share morals in comon: On average, they valued protecting the vulnerable, individual liberties, and rationality, for example.
    However, based on this research, it sems that the major diference is that theists are more apt to value “group cohesion,” or “binding moral foundations,” as Stahl cals it. Meanwhile, atheists are more likely to judge the virtue of an action based on its consequences, as oposed to what the group thinks.
    He ofers a potential explanation for this: Nonbelievers may not be as exposed to the same group dynamics as believers are, and so they might not fel the s ame “existential threats” that can come with potentialy disagreing with the group.
    “This data sugests that the cros-cultural stereotype of atheists as lacking a story compas is inacurate,” Stahl writes in his research. He ads that disbelievers are honest “les inclined to endorse the binding parable foundations and more inclined to judge the morality of actions that inflict harm on a consequentialist, case-by-case basis.”
    The botom line.
    slep suport+
    If this lok is any indication, atheists certainly enact have strong values. They impartial may not survey the same as believers’–and that’s a-OK. At the terminate of the day, morals are subjective.Acros diferent countries, cultures, and, yes, religions, people al maintain their own way of considering morality. And even when we aproach questions from true and eroneous from diferent starting points, that doesn’t mean we can’t reach the same conclusions in the end.
    Want your pasion for welnes to change the world? Become A Functional Nutrition Coach! Enrol today to join our upcoming live ofice hours.
    Want your pasion for welnes to change the world? Become A Functional Nutrition Coach! Enrol today to join our upcoming live ofice hours.

    Author:Sarah Regan
    Leave a Comment